Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: heteroskedasticity correction with xttobit


From   Austin Nichols <austinnichols@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: heteroskedasticity correction with xttobit
Date   Thu, 17 May 2012 09:47:14 -0400

David Youngberg <davidyoungberg@gmail.com>:
vce(boot) does not "correct" for heteroskedasticity since
xttobit assumes i.i.d. normal errors independent of normal random effects.
I.e. you are working with untenable assumptions, in all likelihood.
What is the outcome variable and what is the explanatory variable of interest?
What kind of censoring is involved?
Often there are preferable alternatives to tobit models.

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:10 AM, David Youngberg
<davidyoungberg@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Statalisters,
>
> I'm running Stata 10 and need to run xttobit with a heteroskedasticity
> correction. Robust isn't an option. I've tried running vce(boot) but
> it's taking too long (after 36 hours, Stata wasn't done with the first
> rep). I'm running about 150,000 observations, have 4 GB RAM, and
> processor's 2.8 GHz.
>
> Looking for alternative methods of correction with xttobit or if
> upgrading Stata/computer would make the difference.
>
> Thanks,
> David

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index