Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Citation etiquette: Quantil2


From   Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Citation etiquette: Quantil2
Date   Thu, 3 May 2012 08:34:30 +0100

Thanks, but that has long since been superseded in a way that solves
your problem.

-quantil2- was my generalization of the official Stata command
-quantile-, the omitted "e" reflecting the 8.3 or filename.ext limit
on DOS filenames. I changed the name to -qplot- in 2004.

The best reference for the technique as implemented by me is

Cox, N.J. 2005. Speaking Stata: The protean quantile plot. Stata
Journal 5(3): 442--460

and the latest reference on the code is given within

http://www.stata-journal.com/sjpdf.html?articlenum=up0035

-qqplot- is, and always been, a different (official) command.

Nick

On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:44 PM, paolo.dibetta@fastwebnet.it
<paolo.dibetta@fastwebnet.it> wrote:

> We want to cite:
>
> Cox, N. (1998). Quantil2. Stata module to generate multivariate quantile plot. h
> ttp://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.asp?ft=quantil2.
>
> Is it correct? We’ve seen that usually there is a more complex format, including
>  something such as bocode/sXXXYYY.html.
>
> References to STB-51, STB-61, then qqplot got us a little bit confused.
> Can we have the correct citation? Where to find it?
>

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index