Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
urbain thierry YOGO <yogout@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Binary choice model: Logit using IVs |

Date |
Wed, 4 Apr 2012 19:00:58 +0200 |

you can run a twostep regression by hand using the predicted variable in the second step. But as you said, you have to correct the standard error. But remember the first step cannot be an OLS as far as you need a non linear projection. 2012/4/3, Rüdiger Vollmeier <ruediger.vollmeier@googlemail.com>: > Dear statalistusers, > > I read former posts stating that there was no (user-written-) command > to estimate a simple binary choice model using Logistic regressions > and instrumental variables (in case of endogenous regressors) (I guess > nobody has come up with such a command since the problems were > discussed (?)). > > My problem is as follows: I would like to estimate an Logit regression > using IVs because all the regressions without IVs in my paper do rely > on the logistic distribution of error terms. > > 1. Hence, I would like to know how you typically conduct a Logit using IVs? > 2. Would it be possible to run a 2SLS "by hand" (OLS of endogenous > regressors) and then Logit on the predicted values? (How) would I > correct the standard errors of the parameter estimates in this case? > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > -- *Urbain Thierry YOGO P.h.D candidate in Economics* * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: Binary choice model: Logit using IVs***From:*Rüdiger Vollmeier <ruediger.vollmeier@googlemail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: too many values for -tabulate twoway, summarize-, but not -tabulate twoway-** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: too many values for -tabulate twoway, summarize-, but not -tabulate twoway-** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Binary choice model: Logit using IVs** - Next by thread:
**st: dprobit - Interpretation of coefficients** - Index(es):