Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Re: Normality and Granger Causality in Panel Data

From   Nick Cox <>
Subject   Re: st: Re: Normality and Granger Causality in Panel Data
Date   Mon, 2 Apr 2012 20:07:45 +0100

DD is quite correct and I am happy to acknowledge that. But his email
showed up in my inbox as coming from him, not Statalist.

I will speak for myself -- but I also I guess for most of the more
active people on the list -- in saying thanks, but I don't need or
want two copies of the same reply if I post to Statalist.

On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 7:57 PM, D. Demetriou <> wrote:
> Nick,
> Thank you for you comments and for immediate reply.
> I did not send it privately, you were just 'cc'; the email wa sent to STATA
> List. Sincere apologies if this is also not allowed according to STATA list
> rules.
> Well, as you said, is all about testing the normality of residuals in order
> to cerrectly infer from t-statistics and f-statistics (e.g. significance of
> coefficients, joint significance tests, etc)
*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index