Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Nick Cox <[email protected]> |

To |
[email protected] |

Subject |
Re: st: Comparing strings |

Date |
Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:30:36 +0100 |

This is a bit better: mata : string scalar strscalarsort(string scalar mystring) { real scalar len, i string colvector work len = strlen(mystring) work = J(len, 1, "") for(i = 1; i <= len; i++) work[i] = substr(mystring, i, 1) _sort(work, 1) return(invtokens(work', "")) } end I still don't know what the real problem is, so I am just playing. But if you wanted to compare strings regardless of order of characters something like this would seem needed as a first step. On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:51 AM, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote: > -indexnot()- is a function, not a command. > > It's not clear to me what you want, but you can check for whether the > same letters occur in two strings, at the cost of some programming. > For example, a Mata function can be written to sort the characters of > a string scalar into alphabetical order. Here is one: > > mata : > > string scalar deorst(string scalar mystring) { > > real scalar len > string vector work > len = strlen(mystring) > work = J(len, 1, "") > for(i = 1; i <= len; i++) work[i] = substr(mystring, i, 1) > _sort(work, 1) > mystring = "" > for(i = 1; i <= len; i++) mystring = mystring + work[i] > return(mystring) > } > > end > > . mata : deorst("sorted") > deorst > > . mata : deorst("backwards") > aabcdkrsw > > On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 10:20 PM, jo la frite <[email protected]> wrote: >> thanks Nick and Eric. As far as I understand, the indexnot command compares strings regardless of the ordering of the characters in the string. for example, "frog" and "ogfr" are viewed as identical by indexnot. >> >> >> Is there a way of controling for the ordering of the characters. So for example, "comparing "frog" and "fragro" retuns 3 (position of the first character from "frog" not in "fragro"). > > From: Nick Cox <[email protected]> > >> Stata naturally does have a concept of alphanumeric order for strings; >> otherwise it could not -sort- them. Consider >> >> . di ("frog" < "toad") >> 1 >> >> . di ("frog" < "foo") >> 0 >> >> The first statement is true and the second false. Otherwise put, with >> strings < means "precedes" and > means "follows" in alphanumeric >> order. >> >> This allows one step further forwards: >> >> gen compare = cond(str1 > str2, indexnot(str1, str2), -indexnot(str1, str2)) >> >> If strings are identical, this yields 0. Jo did not make explicit that >> this is what SAS does too, but either way it seems logical to me. >> >> Nick >> >> On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Eric Booth <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Take a look at the string function (-help string_functions-) indexnot() (e.g., "gen x = indexnot(string1, string2)" ) which will give you the leftmost position where the two strings differ. >>> This Stata string function does not assign the positive/negative sign like the sas function you describe, but you can code those yourself by using other string functions to find how they differ in order/sequence/length. >> >> On Mar 24, 2012, at 5:12 PM, jo la frite wrote: >> >>>> Is there a Stata function that correspondons to the Sas function "COMPARE". It allows to compare strings. Specifically, in Sas COMPARE(string-1, string-2) returns a numeric value. The sign of the result is negative if string-1 precedes string-2 in a sort sequence, and positive if string-1 follows string-2 in a sort sequence. The magnitude of the result is equal to the position of the leftmost character at which the strings differ. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: Comparing strings***From:*jo la frite <[email protected]>

**References**:**st: Comparing strings***From:*jo la frite <[email protected]>

**Re: st: Comparing strings***From:*Eric Booth <[email protected]>

**Re: st: Comparing strings***From:*Nick Cox <[email protected]>

**Re: st: Comparing strings***From:*jo la frite <[email protected]>

**Re: st: Comparing strings***From:*Nick Cox <[email protected]>

- Prev by Date:
**st: update seqlogit available from SSC** - Next by Date:
**st: Regression based Shapley Value Decomposition rbdineq** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Comparing strings** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Comparing strings** - Index(es):