Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | "Dimitriy V. Masterov" <dvmaster@gmail.com> |
To | Statalist <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
Subject | st: forecasting a short multivariate time series |
Date | Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:49:08 -0400 |
I need to forecast the following 4 variables for the 29th unit of time. I have roughly 2 years worth of historical data, where 1 and 14 and 27 are all the same period (or time of year). time W wd wc p 1 4.920725 4.684342 4.065288 .5962985 2 4.956172 4.73998 4.092179 .6151785 3 4.85532 4.725982 4.002519 .6028712 4 4.754887 4.674568 3.988028 .5943888 5 4.862039 4.758899 4.045568 .5925704 6 5.039032 4.791101 4.071131 .590314 7 4.612594 4.656253 4.136271 .529247 8 4.722339 4.631588 3.994956 .5801989 9 4.679251 4.647347 3.954906 .5832723 10 4.736177 4.679152 3.974465 .5843731 11 4.738954 4.759482 4.037036 .5868722 12 4.571325 4.707446 4.110281 .556147 13 4.883891 4.750031 4.168203 .602057 14 4.652408 4.703114 4.042872 .6059471 15 4.677363 4.744875 4.232081 .5672519 16 4.695732 4.614248 3.998735 .5838578 17 4.633575 4.6025 3.943488 .5914644 18 4.61025 4.67733 4.066427 .548952 19 4.678374 4.741046 4.060458 .5416393 20 4.48309 4.609238 4.000201 .5372143 21 4.477549 4.583907 3.94821 .5515663 22 4.555191 4.627404 3.93675 .5542806 23 4.508585 4.595927 3.881685 .5572687 24 4.467037 4.619762 3.909551 .5645944 25 4.326283 4.544351 3.877583 .5738906 26 4.672741 4.599463 3.953772 .5769604 27 4.53551 4.506167 3.808779 .5831352 28 4.528004 4.622972 3.90481 .5968299 I believe that W is approximately p*wd + (1 - p)*wc plus measurement error. Here are my 2 questions. Are there any time-series methods that (1) perform better in the face of "micro-numerosity" and (2) would be able to exploit the link between the variables? My first thought was to try vector autoregression on these variables and an exogenous time or period variable: var W wd wc p, exog(time) lag(1 2) dfk The moduli of the eigenvalues are all less than 1, so I don't think I need to worry about stationarity (thought the dfuller test suggest otherwise). The forecast seems on the high side, but reasonable. Does that seem like a good idea? DVM * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/