Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Stas Kolenikov <skolenik@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: Tetrachoric correlations and survey data |
Date | Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:34:00 -0500 |
While the official -tetrachoric- does not support [pweights] or the -svy- features, my -polychoric- would support [pweights] and -cluster()- option (although the way it produces the output, it is only relevant for pairwise correlations when the standard errors are really reported). It does not matter for the point estimates though. The chi-square goodness of fit tests will be wrong. The standard errors via the bootstrap is certainly an option, although you would need to perform the bootstrap in a way that respects the complex design features (http://stata-journal.com/article.html?article=st0187). On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Ronald McDowell <McDowell-R3@email.ulster.ac.uk> wrote: > Is it possible to compute tetrachoric correlations of ordinal data in STATA to take account of survey weights and stratification? > > > ----------------------------------------- > > Ron McDowell > > Institute of Nursing Research > > University of Ulster, Coleraine > > McDowell-R3@email.ulster.ac.uk > > > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ -- Stas Kolenikov, also found at http://stas.kolenikov.name Small print: I use this email account for mailing lists only. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/