Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Erasmo Giambona <e.giambona@gmail.com> |
To | statalist <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
Subject | st: within estimator and effecomic effects |
Date | Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:43:12 +0100 |
Dear All, To assess economic significance, people in finance (including myself) usually rely on the effect of 1 standard deviation increase in the independent variable (multiplied by the coefficient estimate). The standard deviation is usually the sample standard deviation. In principle, this seems incorrect when one is using the within estimator (such as the estimator from xtreg). In this case, it would seem more natural to rely on the within-unit standard deviation. But I am wondering whether this is the correct way of looking at things. I would appreciate if you could share any thoughts on this. Best regards, Erasmo * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/