Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: Zero Inflated Negative Binomial model


From   Eugene Walls <Eugene.Walls@du.edu>
To   "statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: Zero Inflated Negative Binomial model
Date   Fri, 20 Jan 2012 06:02:35 -0700

I am working with a dataset that contains counts of the number of times that youth in the sample engage in self-harming behaviors (such as cutting). My co-authors and I are interested in using the zero-inflated negative binomial models because (a) we have a sample that has about 74% zeroes and (b) because we are conceptualizing two processes occurring - one that predicts the likelihood of crossing the threshold into self-injurious behavior and one that predicts the number of times of engaging in the behavior. The Vuong test seems to indicate that the ZINB model is a better fit for the data than the NBReg model.

Our question concerns if it is appropriate to use the ZINB because the response set of the variable capturing the number of times of engaging in SIB is not a straight count, but rather a "0 times" "1 time" "2-3 times" "4-5 times" "6-10 times" "11-20 times" "21-49 times" "50 or more times". We have recoded the variable into 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 11, 21, 50 using the minimum in the category.but if we do that is using the ZINB model problematic?

Thanks
Eugene


 























.
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index