Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Loop question

From   Maarten Buis <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: Loop question
Date   Fri, 9 Dec 2011 12:29:25 +0100

On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 12:03 PM, K Jensen <[email protected]> wrote:
> What is the easiest way of looping through one isolated value and a
> more conventional loop over a different range?
> Basically, I would like to do something like forvalues i=0 AND
> 0.6(0.1)1.1 except that this syntax doesn't exist.  I.e. I would like
> i to take the values 0, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1

*------------- begin example -------------
foreach i of numlist 0 6/11 {
	local j = `i'/10
	di `j'
*------------ end example -----------------

The direct answer is to use -foreach-.

The additional point here is the due to precision. The number 0.1
cannot be exactly represented in binary, just like the number 1/3
cannot be exactly represented in decimal. So computers work with an
approximation of 0.1, and that can show up in a loop, as in this case
you would repeatedly add up imperfect approximations of 0.1, which
will eventually lead to big enough deviations so that they might show
and cause trouble. So it is better to loop over the values 6/11, as
the value 1 (and other integers) can be exactly represented, and
within the loop divide that number by 10.

Hope this helps,

Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index