Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | ymarchenko@stata.com (Yulia Marchenko, StataCorp LP) |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | st: Re: Wondering why default estimation in xtmixed was changed from REML |
Date | Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:41:19 -0600 |
Bill Simpson <wsimpson@hbs.edu> asks what prompted the change in the default estimation method of -xtmixed- from REML to ML in Stata 12: > Does anyone know why xtmixed changed from REML to MLE for the default > estimation method in version 12? My understanding is that REML estimates of > variance components are less biased than MLE. As of Stata 12, the -xtmixed- command supports sampling weights and cluster/robust standard errors. These features are only available with ML estimation. As such, the default estimation method of -xtmixed- was changed to ML. For small samples, Bill is right that the REML estimates of variance components are less biased than the ML estimates. So, if you have a small number of groups, you would want to switch to REML estimation by specifying the -reml- option with -xtmixed-. When the number of groups is large, the REML and ML estimates will be close. -- Yulia ymarchenko@stata.com * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/