Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Question on graph twoway and graph combine
From
Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Question on graph twoway and graph combine
Date
Wed, 7 Dec 2011 10:09:12 +0000
Nothing silly here.
I agree that you need think carefully about choices here and it's a
matter of what works best.
Nick
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Lars Folkestad <[email protected]> wrote:
> Im not sure if it has anything to with anything or if in just being silly, but using the by option renders a graph where the groups are seperatet in the same graph, but in the same grid.
>
> Using grc1leg , common y - you get two grids and the groups are visually easier to distinguish.
Den 07/12/2011 kl. 10.18 skrev "Nick Cox" <[email protected]>:
>> That's good advice, but I don't understand why -by()- couldn't be used
>> in the first place. What does any estimation process have to do with
>> graphing?
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Phil Clayton
>>> You could try -findit grc1leg-
>>>
>>> On 07/12/2011, at 8:09 PM, Alberto R Osella wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm using Stata 12.0 on W7. I've drawn two graphs (one for each sex) by using -graph twoway- and then I've combined them by using -graph combine-. I've drawn graphics separately because I can't using the by() option as a result of the estimation process. The resulting combine graph has two legends (the same) and I want a graph with only one legend.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/