Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Question on graph twoway and graph combine

From   Nick Cox <>
Subject   Re: st: Question on graph twoway and graph combine
Date   Wed, 7 Dec 2011 10:09:12 +0000

Nothing silly here.

I agree that you need think carefully about choices here and it's a
matter of what works best.


On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Lars Folkestad <> wrote:

> Im not sure if it has anything to with anything or if in just being silly, but using the by option renders a graph where the groups are seperatet in the same graph, but in the same grid.
> Using grc1leg , common y - you get two grids and the groups are visually easier to distinguish.

Den 07/12/2011 kl. 10.18 skrev "Nick Cox" <>:

>> That's good advice, but I don't understand why -by()- couldn't be used
>> in the first place. What does any estimation process have to do with
>> graphing?

On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Phil Clayton

>>> You could try -findit grc1leg-
>>> On 07/12/2011, at 8:09 PM, Alberto R Osella wrote:
>>>> I'm using Stata 12.0 on W7. I've drawn two graphs (one for each sex) by using -graph twoway- and then I've combined them by using -graph combine-. I've drawn graphics separately because I can't using the by() option as a result of the estimation process. The resulting combine graph has two legends (the same) and I want a graph with only one legend.

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index