Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: starting values invalid

From   Nick Cox <>
To   "''" <>
Subject   st: RE: starting values invalid
Date   Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:39:22 +0000

I think that means you have to supply better starting values than whatever are the defaults. 


Ivica Rubil

I solved the problem with max # of vars, but here's another one. When I run my -nlsur-, I get:

Calculating NLS estimates...
could not evaluate equation 1
starting values invalid or some RHS variables have missing values

I have checked and there are no missing values for any of the r.h.s. variables. So, how to deal with the first part of the message - "starting values invalid"?

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index