Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: xthtaylor by hand or using xtivreg2
From 
 
"M.M. Kramer" <[email protected]> 
To 
 
[email protected] 
Subject 
 
Re: st: xthtaylor by hand or using xtivreg2 
Date 
 
Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:22:20 +0100 
Dear Mark,
The xtoverid works very well, thanks a lot for your help. It now gives 
first stage results for all instrumented variables, and given that all 
variables are instrumented, I get many first stage results, including 
some useful statistics. My only question is whether there is an easy way 
to see which variable is behind the "recoded" variable that xtoverid 
creates (with names like: __00000J __00000M __00000P __00000S __00000V, 
etc). I was thinking to correlate them with the original variables to 
see whether something can be inferred from that, but the new variables 
are not kept in Stata. Do you have any suggestion for this?
Thanks,
Marc
Schaffer, Mark E wrote:
Marc,
The xtoverid update is now available (with thanks as usual to Kit Baum).
The -noi- option automatically triggers the -first- option in the
internal call to -ivreg2- so you should see everything about the
first-stage estimations.
Best wishes,
Mark
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of M.M. Kramer
Sent: 03 November 2011 10:22
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: xthtaylor by hand or using xtivreg2
Mark,
thanks a lot, I'll wait for the update.
Marc
Schaffer, Mark E wrote:
   
-noisily-    
Marc,
I found the source of your first problem: the undocumented       
option of -xtoverid- was using another option that was incompatible 
with displaying first-stage results.
the update    
I'll fix it and let you and the rest of the list know when       
reestimation of eqn    
is available.
Cheers,
Mark
       
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of M.M. 
Kramer
Sent: 02 November 2011 15:06
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: xthtaylor by hand or using xtivreg2
Hi Mark,
After xtoverid, noisily (I cannot find xtoverid2) I receive the 
following errors:
1. Unable to display summary of first-stage estimates; macro
e(first) is missing 2. xtoverid error: internal         
xtoverid2    
differs from original
And sometimes also:
Warning - endogenous variable(s) collinear with instruments
                      *:  3200  conformability error
                s_egmm():     -  function returned error
                 <istmt>:     -  function returned error
Thanks for your help.
Marc
Schaffer, Mark E wrote:
           
Marc,
What is the problem you encounter when using xtoverid or           
that this    
with the noisily option?  Is it that the full first-stage results 
aren't displayed?  I was looking at the code and it seems           
treatment on    
undocumented option should - but doesn't - trigger display of the 
first-stage results.
--Mark
                 
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of M.M. 
Kramer
Sent: 02 November 2011 09:26
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: xthtaylor by hand or using xtivreg2
Dear Nick,
I am trying to estimate the impact of a self-choosen             
results when    
portfolio returns of retail investors. This self-choosen
                    
treatment is
           
very likely endogenous, it does not vary over time and we
                    
do not have
           
external instuments available, so Hausman-Taylor might be an 
appropriate estimation technique.  The problem that I keep 
encountering is that I cannot assess the quality of the
                    
instruments
           
that xthtaylor creates. I cannot see the first stage             
see what's    
using xtoverid2 and I receive warnings on collinearity. My
                    
idea was
           
to create the instruments by hand and then use 2SLS to             
want to see    
going on. So far, I found that xthtaylor transforms the
                    
timevarying
           
exogenous variables into means, and demeaned variables and
                    
uses some
           
other transformations.
My question therefore is how exactly to replicate the variable 
transformation of xthaylor to create the instruments by hand.
Marc
Nick Cox wrote:
                       
Many people will sympathise to some degree here, but what
                              
kind of help
                       
are you expecting _which can reasonably be provided_?
1. To comment helpfully on your difficulties with
                              
-xthtaylor- people
                       
will surely want more detail on your problems.
2. If you seek to use -xtivreg2- (SSC), the same comment applies
there: the help is the place to start and people will 
              
xthtaylor command.    
specific queries.
3. -xthtaylor- is some hundreds of lines long, so
                              
reproducing it "by
                       
hand" is not trivial.
Nick
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 8:26 AM, M.M. Kramer
                              
<[email protected]> wrote:
                       
                               
I have been struggling for some time with the                 
transform the    
Especially the various error messages that occur after
                                    
some tests are hard to solve.
                       
 Does anyone have any clear instructions on how to 
                
860 P.O.    
860 P.O.            
variables in a way that xtivreg2 can be used?  Or may be
                                    
anyone has
                       
the syntax to replicate the output of xthtaylor by hand.
Thanks.
Marc Kramer
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
                                        
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
                                
--
Marc Kramer
University of Groningen
Faculty of Economics & Business
Department of Economics, Econometrics and Finance Room WSN
                    
Box 800 9700 AV Groningen
Tel.: 050-363.4532 / 3685
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
                        
--
Marc Kramer
University of Groningen
Faculty of Economics & Business
Department of Economics, Econometrics and Finance Room WSN         
Box 800 9700 AV Groningen
Tel.: 050-363.4532 / 3685
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
            
--
Marc Kramer
University of Groningen
Faculty of Economics & Business
Department of Economics, Econometrics and Finance Room WSN 860 P.O. 
Box 800 9700 AV Groningen
Tel.: 050-363.4532 / 3685
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
    
  
--
Marc Kramer
University of Groningen
Faculty of Economics & Business
Department of Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Room WSN 860
P.O. Box 800
9700 AV Groningen
Tel.: 050-363.4532 / 3685
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/