Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
| From | Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com> |
| To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
| Subject | Re: st: Fwd: Comparing marginal effects of two subsamples |
| Date | Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:35:41 +0200 |
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Jianhong Chen wrote: > First, I used -nbreg, dv iv moderator iv*moderator- <snip> > Then, I used nbreg, dv iv moderator iv*moderator, irr <snip> > So when I report the results in the table, I will use IRR, not coef, > right? The really important thing is that you and your audience understands what the numbers you report mean. So, pick whichever you think you understand and can explain to your audience. > Do you have a published paper who also used > the same approach for my reference? <http://www.stata.com/bookstore/regmodcdvs.html> -- Maarten -------------------------- Maarten L. Buis Institut fuer Soziologie Universitaet Tuebingen Wilhelmstrasse 36 72074 Tuebingen Germany http://www.maartenbuis.nl -------------------------- * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/