Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: urgency (again) [was: Re: statalist-digest V4 #4296]

From   Nick Cox <>
To   "''" <>
Subject   st: RE: urgency (again) [was: Re: statalist-digest V4 #4296]
Date   Wed, 5 Oct 2011 17:35:36 +0100

Thanks for this suggestion, which we will think about. Also, some people have sent in views privately, including very firm defences of the existing statement, which need consideration. 

I think the main point about claims of urgency is that they are futile in practice, quite apart from the irritation that they cause some of us. The main advice is: Don't do that, because it won't help and it may well harm your chances of getting a good answer. 

If anyone says that they would try to answer an urgent email more quickly, or more thoroughly, or rather than one not claiming urgency, then I am wrong; i.e. those people evidently would pay more attention to claims of urgency. 

However, I don't really want to enlarge a debate that I don't see as necessary. 

© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index