Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: problem running mfx after glm

From   "Sarah Edgington" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   st: RE: problem running mfx after glm
Date   Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:38:49 -0700

You haven't given the list enough information to really help you.
What do you mean when you say it's giving you a problem?  What error message
are you actually getting?  Have you gotten a new version of Stata since you
last run the analysis?  If so, have you tried running the dofile using the
-version- command?
Others may be able to help you with translating to -margins- but you should
be able to run your original analysis without rewriting it.


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marlis Gonzalez
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 3:27 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: st: problem running mfx after glm


Did the following analysis last fall:

glm  ReadingCompCombdiv100 education, family(binomial) link(logit) robust

followed by:

mfx, at(mean)

This provided me with the marginal effects after glm (variable of interest
is a proportion).

Any idea why this is giving me a problem.having trouble figuring out how to
do this using margins instead of mfx.


M González

*   For searches and help try:

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index