Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Nick Cox <[email protected]> |

To |
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> |

Subject |
st: RE: How to perfom very simple manipulations in large data sets more efficiently |

Date |
Fri, 12 Aug 2011 15:56:44 +0100 |

```
This is clear but the problem nevertheless retains some ambiguity.
First, these approaches aren't equivalent. (1) loses all the data except for those observation(s) that are equal to the minimum. (2) keeps all the data.
Second, as the sentence above hints, in general there could be several observations that tie for minimum on X. Perhaps you are confident that this won't bite for your application.
A variant on (1) is
sum X, meanonly
su Y if X==r(min)
which will tell you about duplicates.
It doesn't answer your question, but I'll record nevertheless that some of this territory was reviewed in
SJ-11-2 dm0055 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Speaking Stata: Compared with ...
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N. J. Cox
Q2/11 SJ 11(2):305--314 (no commands)
reviews techniques for relating values to values in other
observations
As you are doing this thousands of times, I think you need to get some timings for a few sample datasets.
Nick
[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tiago V. Pereira
Sent: 12 August 2011 15:43
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: How to perfom very simple manipulations in large data sets more efficiently
Dear statalisters,
I have to perform extremely simple tasks, but I am struggling with the low
efficiency of my dummy implementations. Perhaps you might have smarter
ideas.
Here is an example:
Suppose I have two variables, X and Y.
I need to the get value of Y that is associated with the smallest value of X.
What I usually do is:
(1) simple approach 1
*/ ------ start --------
sum X, meanonly
keep if X==r(min)
local my_value = Y[1]
*/ ------ end --------
(2) simple approach 2
*/ ------ start --------
sort X
local my_value = Y[1]
*/ ------ end --------
These approaches are simple, and work very well for small data sets. Now,
I have to repeat that procedure 10k times, for data sets that range from
500k to 1000k observations. Hence, both procedures 1 and 2 become clearly
slow.
If you have any tips, I will be very grateful.
All the best,
Tiago
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
```

**References**:**st: How to perfom very simple manipulations in large data sets more efficiently***From:*"Tiago V. Pereira" <[email protected]>

- Prev by Date:
**RE: st: Repeated measured analysis** - Next by Date:
**st: Time Series: Drift or No Drift** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: How to perfom very simple manipulations in large data sets more efficiently** - Next by thread:
**st: Time Series: Drift or No Drift** - Index(es):