Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
| From | "Bontempo, Daniel E" <deb193@ku.edu> |
| To | "'statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu'" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
| Subject | st: R. notation |
| Date | Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:38:09 +0000 |
I get slightly different results in xtmelogit with "|| Subj:" versus "|| _all R.Subj", and the differences increase if there is a 2nd crossed random effect. Do these two notations specify the same model? ... but the differences stem from Laplacian approximation? Also, I find the i. and c. notation documented under "fvvarlist", but where can I find documentation discussing R. notation? Thanks * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/