st: superscript in SMCL

[Ricardo Ovaldia <ovaldia@yahoo.com>]

I will lide to use superscript on a display line. Is there a way to do this?

I tryed a couplr of things but they do not work:

. di " x {superscript:2}"
 x {superscript:2}

. di "{&function} x {superscript:2}"
 {&function} x {superscript:2}


Thank you,
Ricardo

Ricardo Ovaldia, MS
Statistician 
Oklahoma City, OK


--- On Wed, 7/20/11, Ángel Rodríguez Laso <angelrlaso@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Ángel Rodríguez Laso <angelrlaso@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: st: Two factor anova post test
> To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
> Date: Wednesday, July 20, 2011, 3:54 PM
> Sorry I misunderstood which factor
> was significant.
> 
> I cannot give you any advice on carrying out post hoc tests
> in ANOVA
> in Stata, that is one answer to your question, because I
> haven't done
> any. But maybe this link can give you some clues:
> 
> http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/faq/pairwise.htm
> 
> Best regars,
> 
> Angel Rodriguez-Laso
> 
> 2011/7/19 Ricardo Ovaldia <ovaldia@yahoo.com>:
> > Thank you Angel. The term that is significant is race,
> with three levels, therefore I am not completely sure which
> means are different, and I do not understand how to use
> -test-, or even if that is the correct way  to compare
> them.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Ricardo.
> >
> > Ricardo Ovaldia, MS
> > Statistician
> > Oklahoma City, OK
> >
> >
> > --- On Mon, 7/18/11, Ángel Rodríguez Laso <angelrlaso@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Ángel Rodríguez Laso <angelrlaso@gmail.com>
> >> Subject: Re: st: Two factor anova post test
> >> To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
> >> Date: Monday, July 18, 2011, 4:05 PM
> >> Dear Ricardo;
> >>
> >> If you were having many factors and many
> interactions, you
> >> should be
> >> worried about and incresed alpha error level for
> the
> >> F-test, but with
> >> 2 factors I doubt this is a problem. Moreover,
> your p level
> >> for the
> >> significance of sex is far away from the
> conventional 0.05,
> >> while the
> >> interaction sex*race is non-significant. Therefore
> you can
> >> conclude
> >> that there is a significant difference only
> between sexes.
> >> Because
> >> there are only two levels, there is no need to
> carry out
> >> any posthoc
> >> test like Scheffe, because you already know which
> means are
> >> different,
> >> those of men and women.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >> Angel Rodriguez-Laso
> >>
> >> 2011/7/18 Ricardo Ovaldia <ovaldia@yahoo.com>:
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> > I performed a two factor ANOVA; one factor
> (sex) has 2
> >> levels and the other factor (race) has 3 levels.
> The
> >> interaction term is not significant but one of the
> factors,
> >> race, is (p=0.0004). How can I determine which
> means are
> >> different while maintaining the experiment wise
> type I error
> >> rate.
> >> >
> >> > If I had only one factor, I could use
> -oneway- and
> >> then use, for example, scheffe for multiple
> comparisons. But
> >> not sure what to do with two factors.
> >> >
> >> > Thank you in advance,
> >> > Ricardo
> >> >
> >> > Ricardo Ovaldia, MS
> >> > Statistician
> >> > Oklahoma City, OK
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > *
> >> > *   For searches and help try:
> >> > *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> >> > *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> >> > *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> >> >
> >>
> >> *
> >> *   For searches and help try:
> >> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> >> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> >> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> >>
> >
> > *
> > *   For searches and help try:
> > *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> > *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> > *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> >
> 
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> 

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/