Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: How to conclude? Poisson Regression: Prob > chi2 = .00000, estat gof prob > chi2(4) = .0164 |

Date |
Mon, 11 Jul 2011 09:25:00 +0200 |

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 3:19 AM, Herberto Gomez wrote: > In a poisson regression how to decide if the model is adequate? > > If prob > chi2 from top part of the Poisson regression conflicts with > estat gof conclusion, > what should I decide. The null-hypotheses in these tests are never "this model is adequate" instead they tend to test a very specific hypothesis, e.g. in the case of chi2 test at the top of the output the null hypothesis is that all estimated coefficients except the constant are simultaneously equal to 0. So the first step is to find out what exactly these tests test, and whether you care about that. More importantly never use (only) statistical tests to decide whether a model is adequate. Statistical tests are an extremely useful tool in our toolbox, but that does not mean it can be applied to all problems. Remember that models are supposed to be simplifications of reality, which by necessity means that they are supposed be useful not true. So to decide whether a model is adequate you (and not "Statistics", Stata, the computer or some guru) need to make a tradeoff between simplification and realism. Statistical test are not designed for that tradeoff. Some people fear that this is too subjective or non-scientific. The answer to that is that you can and should document and report how and why you made these decisions. That way people check what you have done and see for themselves whether they agree with you, and have a reasoned debate with you in case they do not. This is what makes a study scientific, not the fact that you have literally followed the instructions set out in some statistics "cookbook". Hope this helps, Maarten -------------------------- Maarten L. Buis Institut fuer Soziologie Universitaet Tuebingen Wilhelmstrasse 36 72074 Tuebingen Germany http://www.maartenbuis.nl -------------------------- * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: How to conclude? Poisson Regression: Prob > chi2 = .00000, estat gof prob > chi2(4) = .0164***From:*Herberto Gomez <herbogomez@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Testing independence of factor variables in a non-linear specification** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: marginal effects and std. coefficients after xtlogit** - Previous by thread:
**st: How to conclude? Poisson Regression: Prob > chi2 = .00000, estat gof prob > chi2(4) = .0164** - Next by thread:
**st: marginal effects and std. coefficients after xtlogit** - Index(es):