Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: MP Performance for Structural Equation Models in Stata 12


From   Stas Kolenikov <skolenik@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: MP Performance for Structural Equation Models in Stata 12
Date   Mon, 4 Jul 2011 14:40:52 -0400

If you see that your request for [a rather complicated question here]
does not solicit an answer, then may be the answer is to write your
own review of [this rather complicated question]. This is a good
example: if you have access to all of these software items, you can
run the comparisons and prepare a paper.

On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 10:15 AM, William R. Buchanan
<William@williambuchanan.net> wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> I did see that message the other day but didn't know if there had been comparisons to other statistical packages.  On a slighty unrelated note, I was also wondering whether there was support to report the results using the GUI interface (i.e., putting coefficients along the paths in the model)?
>
> Like a few others, I'd very much like to dump the other stats packages, but want to make sure that the Stata command will be comparable in speed.
>
> Thanks for sending the link though,
> Billy Buchanan
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jul 2, 2011, at 10:02 AM, Eric Booth <ebooth@ppri.tamu.edu> wrote:
>
>> <>
>> William Gould made some remarks about the speed of -sem-  the other day on SL:
>>
>> http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2011-06/msg01180.html
>>
>>
>> - Eric
>> __
>> Eric A. Booth
>> Public Policy Research Institute
>> Texas A&M University
>> ebooth@ppri.tamu.edu
>>
>> On Jul 2, 2011, at 7:19 AM, William Robert Buchanan wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> I was just looking through the MP performance report on Stata's website
>>> (http://stata.com/statamp/report.pdf) and was wondering if anyone had any
>>> idea regarding performance with the new version of the software.  Like a few
>>> other users, I would love nothing more than to get rid of the SEM software
>>> that I have if I can fit the models in Stata.  That being said, I was
>>> wondering what kind of efficiency gains there are for the different flavors
>>> of Stata MP with respect to fitting - sem - models?  I think it would also
>>> be great if there was information available comparing the processing time of
>>> the different SEM software (i.e., EQS, M-Plus, LISREL, AMOS, etc...) with
>>> the - sem - command in Stata 12.
>>>
>>> I was also wondering if there have been any improvements to the way Stata 12
>>> will handle - gllamm - compared to previous releases.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Billy Buchanan
>>>
>>> *
>>> *   For searches and help try:
>>> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>>> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>>> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>>
>>
>>
>> *
>> *   For searches and help try:
>> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>



-- 
Stas Kolenikov, also found at http://stas.kolenikov.name
Small print: I use this email account for mailing lists only.

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index