Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | "Justina Fischer" <JAVFischer@gmx.de> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: Valid instrument test for exactly identified regression |
Date | Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:34:03 +0200 |
well, going back to your econometric textbook you could test whether the instrument is significant when added to the main regression (exclusion restriction) - it should not be.... Justina Fischer -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:10:32 +0000 > Von: etanebay@yahoo.com > An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > Betreff: st: Valid instrument test for exactly identified regression > Hi all, > I have a model that is exactly identified, so the xtivreg2 command gives > me a zero for the Hansen J statistic. > Can you please advise: how do I test the validity of the IV, that it > doesn't correlate with the errors in the structural equation? > I know the IV is relevant from the first stage (1st stage F-test, > weak-instrument robust inference tests -- all reject null at 99%). > Thanks! > E > Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld > Powered by Gee! from StarHub > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ -- Justina AV Fischer, PhD Senior Researcher Faculty of Economics University of Mannheim homepage: http://www.justinaavfischer.de/ e-mail: javfischer@gmx.de papers: http://ideas.repec.org/e/pfi55.html * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/