Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Steven Samuels <[email protected]> |

To |
[email protected] |

Subject |
Re: st: Left truncation in survival analysis |

Date |
Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:30:02 -0400 |

Well, re-reading Wooldridge's 2002 book, p. 700, I see that he refers to "left censoring" as an observation problem ("if some or all of the starting times a_i are not observed" whereas "left truncation" is the sample selection problem. That's consistent, but I think that "left-truncation" would cover both cases. Steve Ref: Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press -- It would be interesting to know how these variant usages arise. The earliest references I have about truncation is Sampford (1954). He uses the word "truncated" if some event times fall outside the interval of observation, but he states that Hald (1952) used the word "censoring" to refer to cases when the numbers of "truncated" observations are known. In Turnbull (1976) the distinction is clear, as it is in the text by Klein et al. (2003) The original meaning of truncation is that the analyst is aware of observations only if they are observed in certain intervals. Thus if data are left-truncated, only those that survive past the truncation point are observed. The failure times for these can then be interval-censored, left-censored, right-censored, or not censored at all. I wonder how D'Addio and Ronsholm cope with the distinction. References: Hald, A. (1952) Statistical Theory with Engineering Applications. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Klein, John P., and Melvin L. Moeschberger. 2003. Survival Analysis : Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data. 2nd ed. ed. New York: Springer Sampford MR.(1954). The estimation of response-time distribution, 111: Truncation and survival. Biometrics, 10, 531-561. Turnbull, B.W. (1976) The empirical distribution function with arbitrarily grouped, censored and truncated data. J. R. Statist. Soc. B, 38, 290-295. Steve On Apr 29, 2011, at 9:00 AM, Yigit Aydede wrote: Hi Steve, I saw your two recent posting on Statalist. Thanks again. As you suggested, I guess the best way is to remove subjects with unknown t0 from my analysis. By the way, I've found a paper ("Left-Censoring in Duration data: Theory and Applications" by Anna Christina D'Addio and Michael Rosholm. Working Paper No: 2002-5 Department of Economics, University of Aarhus Denmark) that describes my case as "left-censoring" and offers some solutions. It has a good summary for all possible cases. Thanks again --Yigit Yigit Aydede Department of Economics Sobey School of Business Saint Mary's University [email protected] * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**Re: st: Left truncation in survival analysis***From:*Yigit Aydede <[email protected]>

- Prev by Date:
**st: Stock-Yogo critical values for 5 endogenous variables** - Next by Date:
**st: RE: Stock-Yogo critical values for 5 endogenous variables** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Left truncation in survival analysis** - Next by thread:
**st: Compare non-nested models using complex survey data** - Index(es):