Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Johannes Geyer <[email protected]> |

To |
[email protected] |

Subject |
Antwort: Re: Re: st: Putting Coefficients in the same column with esttab/estout |

Date |
Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:30:11 +0200 |

Thinking again about your problem, you could use esttab and refer to r(coefs) and then extract and repost the vectors You can cycle through your saved estimation results like Daniel Klein suggested in an earlier post, clear all sysuse auto reg price mpg trunk, nocons esttab, se matrix C1 = r(coefs) reg price weight, nocons esttab, se matrix C2 = r(coefs) matrix C = C1\C2 matrix b = C[1....,1]' matrix se = C[1....,2]' ereturn post b estadd matrix se esttab, se johannes [email protected] schrieb am 28/04/2011 19:14:33: > You are right and your suggestion is what I thought, more or less. But > the point is that i should run all the regressions again, shouldn't I? > And this would took quite a long time for me. > Is there a way to type the command matrix without running them another time? > > 2011/4/28 Johannes Geyer <[email protected]>: > > I did not understand that you estimate six models and want to report only > > three columns - is that correct? > > > > If so, you have to tell esttab that the coefficients of models x and y > > belong to the same column, -order- is > > not designed to do that. > > > > Ben Jann provides an example on his webpage that is related in the sense > > that it shows how to change > > models and regressors in a table using Stata syntax > > > > http://repec.org/bocode/e/estout/advanced.html#advanced907 > > > > The problem in your case is much simpler I guess. You have to -ereturn > > post- beta and se vectors and > > tabulate them, e.g.: > > > > ****************************************************** > > sysuse auto > > reg mpg foreign weight, nocons > > matrix k = e(b) > > reg mpg rep78 trunk, nocons > > matrix k = k,e(b) > > ereturn post k > > eststo clear > > esttab > > ***************************************************** > > > > > > Johannes > > > > ---------------------- > > Johannes Geyer > > Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW Berlin) > > German Institute for Economic Research > > Department of Public Economics > > DIW Berlin > > Mohrenstraße 58 > > 10117 Berlin > > Tel: +49-30-89789-258 > > > > [email protected] schrieb am 28/04/2011 17:45:30: > > > >> Yes, what you see is what I get with that, unfortunately. > >> > >> 2011/4/28 Johannes Geyer <[email protected]>: > >> > did you try the option -order-? > >> > > >> > esttab ... , order(lagvar1 avg5fvar lagvar2 avg5gvar...) > >> > > >> > Johannes > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > ---------------------- > >> > Johannes Geyer > >> > Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW Berlin) > >> > German Institute for Economic Research > >> > Department of Public Economics > >> > DIW Berlin > >> > Mohrenstraße 58 > >> > 10117 Berlin > >> > Tel: +49-30-89789-258 > >> > > >> > [email protected] schrieb am 28/04/2011 16:55:52: > >> > > >> >> Dear all Stata users, > >> >> I have just finished running a lot of estimates that i have saved on > >> >> my computer with the command estwrite (after having stored them with > >> >> estimates store). Now it comes to make some tables, but with both the > >> >> commands esttab and estout I cannot let some coefficients stay in the > >> >> same column. I can be more precise with an example. What i get with > >> >> either esttab (or even estout) is: > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> >> (1) (2) (3) > >> >> (4) (5) (6) > >> >> > >> > > >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> >> lagpolity1 0.014*** > >> >> (0.000) > >> >> lagpolity2 0.027*** > >> >> (0.001) > >> >> avg5polity1 > >> >> 0.015*** > >> >> > >> >> (0.001) > >> >> avg5polity2 > >> >> 0.028*** > >> >> > >> >> (0.001) > >> >> lagfh1 0.054*** > >> >> (0.002) > >> >> lagfh2 0.123*** > >> >> (0.002) > >> >> avg5fh_opp1 > >> >> 0.045*** > >> >> > >> >> (0.002) > >> >> avg5fh_opp2 > >> >> 0.114*** > >> >> > >> >> (0.002) > >> >> lagchga1 0.112*** > >> >> (0.007) > >> >> lagchga2 0.347*** > >> >> (0.007) > >> >> avg5chga1 > >> >> 0.116*** > >> >> > >> >> (0.007) > >> >> avg5chga2 > >> >> 0.352*** > >> >> > >> >> (0.008) > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> But what I'd like to get is the coefficients of all those that I call > >> >> avg5 below the coefficients of the lagged vars. In other words, > >> >> something like: > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> >> (1) (2) (3) > >> >> (4) (5) (6) > >> >> > >> > > >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> >> lagpolity1 0.014*** > >> >> (0.000) > >> >> lagpolity2 0.027*** > >> >> (0.001) > >> >> avg5polity1 0.015*** > >> >> (0.001) > >> >> avg5polity2 0.028*** > >> >> (0.001) > >> >> lagfh1 0.054*** > >> >> (0.002) > >> >> lagfh2 0.123*** > >> >> (0.002) > >> >> avg5fh_opp1 0.045*** > >> >> (0.002) > >> >> avg5fh_opp2 0.114*** > >> >> (0.002) > >> >> lagchga1 0.112*** > >> >> (0.007) > >> >> lagchga2 0.347*** > >> >> (0.007) > >> >> avg5chga1 0.116*** > >> >> (0.007) > >> >> avg5chga2 0.352*** > >> >> (0.008) > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> But obviously I do not want to run all the regressions again (it'd > >> >> take ages!!). > >> >> > >> >> Anyone can help me? > >> >> > >> >> Thanks to all of you for your time and consideration, > >> >> > >> >> Regards, > >> >> > >> >> Emanuele. > >> >> * > >> >> * For searches and help try: > >> >> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > >> >> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > >> >> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > >> > > >> > > >> > * > >> > * For searches and help try: > >> > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > >> > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > >> > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > >> > > >> > >> * > >> * For searches and help try: > >> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > >> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > >> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > > > > > > * > > * For searches and help try: > > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > > > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: Re: Re: st: Putting Coefficients in the same column with esttab/estout***From:*emanuele mazzini <[email protected]>

**References**:**Re: Re: st: Putting Coefficients in the same column with esttab/estout***From:*emanuele mazzini <[email protected]>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Wald test with two dummies** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Left truncation in survival analysis** - Previous by thread:
**Re: Re: st: Putting Coefficients in the same column with esttab/estout** - Next by thread:
**Re: Re: Re: st: Putting Coefficients in the same column with esttab/estout** - Index(es):