Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: different handling if missings in programs using syntax varlist [if}
From 
 
Bjorn Van Campenhout <[email protected]> 
To 
 
[email protected] 
Subject 
 
st: different handling if missings in programs using syntax varlist [if} 
Date 
 
Thu, 21 Apr 2011 23:55:54 +0200 
Dear statalist,
I have observed different outcomes when I have missing observations in 
programs that use the if qualifier. I was wondering what logic is behind 
this.
Here is a self-contained example:
sysuse auto
replace price=. if foreign==1
cap pro drop foo
pro def foo
  syntax varlist
  gen comment="this is only a test"
end
cap pro drop foobar
pro def foobar
  syntax varlist [if]
  marksample touse
  gen comment="this is only a test" if `touse'
end
foo price
drop comment
foobar price
For those who wonder, I am trying to make a program that reports 
missings and want to be able to use conditions in my function calls.
Kind regards,
Bjorn
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/