Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Ashley Arnio <anarnio2@yahoo.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: anketest, ivreg, and spivreg |
Date | Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:21:56 -0700 (PDT) |
As always, thank you Rafal. ----- Original Message ---- From: "rraciborski@stata.com" <rraciborski@stata.com> To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Sent: Tue, April 12, 2011 10:43:45 AM Subject: st: anketest, ivreg, and spivreg Ashley Arnio <anarnio2@yahoo.com> has some questions about the user-written -spivreg- command: > I have determined from the anketest (using an iv-sar model) that the spatial > error model may not be suitable for my data. Is it appropriate to use only the > dlmat option when using spivreg? Yes. > Also, I have tried to replicate the results I obtained from spivreg SAR model > using ivreg with a spatially lagged dependent variable and the results are > different. Are these two models not equivalent? The two models are not equivalent. To learn more about the various spatial-autoregressive models with endogeneous variables Ashley should read sections 2 and 6.4 of the working paper 'A command for estimating spatial-autoregressive models with spatial-autoregressive disturbances and additional endogenous variables' available at http://econweb.umd.edu/~prucha/Papers/WP_spivreg_2011.pdf. --Rafal rraciborski@stata.com * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/