Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: anketest, ivreg, and spivreg


From   Ashley Arnio <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: anketest, ivreg, and spivreg
Date   Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:21:56 -0700 (PDT)

As always, thank you Rafal. 



----- Original Message ----
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tue, April 12, 2011 10:43:45 AM
Subject: st: anketest, ivreg, and spivreg

Ashley Arnio <[email protected]> has some questions about the user-written
-spivreg- command:

> I have determined from the anketest (using an iv-sar model) that the spatial 
> error model may not be suitable for my data. Is it appropriate to use only the 

> dlmat option when using spivreg? 

Yes.

> Also, I have tried to replicate the results I obtained from spivreg SAR model 
> using ivreg with a spatially lagged dependent variable and the results are 
> different. Are these two models not equivalent? 

The two models are not equivalent.  To learn more about the various
spatial-autoregressive models with endogeneous variables Ashley should read
sections 2 and 6.4 of the working paper 'A command for estimating
spatial-autoregressive models with spatial-autoregressive disturbances and
additional endogenous variables' available at
http://econweb.umd.edu/~prucha/Papers/WP_spivreg_2011.pdf.

--Rafal
[email protected]
*
*  For searches and help try:
*  http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?searchhttp://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faqhttp://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index