Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: radical change in t-stat, sign and significance |

Date |
Fri, 1 Apr 2011 19:18:30 +0100 |

This need not be worrying. The signs are only part of the information. The magnitudes are important too. Also, remember that x and x^2 are correlated and may to some extent serve as proxies for each other, even if there is no declared problem of multicollinearity. What you can easily do is plot the two terms using -twoway function-. Your intuition can easily mislead. Also, standard calculus methods can show you the position of the turning point, which may not be within the range of the data. Made-up examples can be instructive too, e.g. twoway function -x, ra(0 10) || function -0.25 * (x^2) + 0.8 * x , ra(0 10) Nick On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Fabio Zona <fabio.zona@unibocconi.it> wrote: > Dear all, > > I have a regression (zero inflated negative binomial): when I include the linear predictor alone (without its square term), the coefficient of this linear predictor is negative and significant. > However, when I introduce the square term of the same predictor: a) the linear one changes its sign, becomes positive, and it is still significant; b) the square term gets a negative sign and is signficant. > > Is this radical change in sign and significance of the linear coefficient a signal of some problems in the model? > > the collin command says I have no prob lem of multicollinearity * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: radical change in t-stat, sign and significance***From:*Fabio Zona <fabio.zona@unibocconi.it>

- Prev by Date:
**st: Data Management Loop** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: radical change in t-stat, sign and significance** - Previous by thread:
**st: radical change in t-stat, sign and significance** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: radical change in t-stat, sign and significance** - Index(es):