Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: xtabond2 year dummies
From
Humaira Asad <[email protected]>
To
STATA HELP <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: xtabond2 year dummies
Date
Fri, 1 Apr 2011 14:48:16 +0000
I am adding them in ivstyle() adding them makes all my regressors insignificant. Is there a sultion to this problem?
Humaira Asad
PhD Research Scholar
UoE Business School
University of Exeter, England
----------------------------------------
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 10:37:11 -0400
> Subject: re: st: xtabond2 year dummies
>
> <>
> In a dynamic model (I am using xtabond2) is it necessary to add the year dummies,...
>
>
> You should add them as IV-style (rather than GMM-style) instruments. Then the number of instruments will rise, but only by the number of years - 1.
>
> Kit Baum | Boston College Economics & DIW Berlin | http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html
> An Introduction to Stata Programming | http://www.stata-press.com/books/isp.html
> An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata | http://www.stata-press.com/books/imeus.html
>
>
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/