Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: replacing time effect from fixed effect panel regression with observed variables
From 
 
Nikunj Kapadia <[email protected]> 
To 
 
[email protected] 
Subject 
 
st: replacing time effect from fixed effect panel regression with observed variables 
Date 
 
Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:23:13 -0400 
I am running a two-way fixed effect (T, N) panel regression where the 
panel has data on firms over time as follows:
xi: areg Y X i.date, absorb(firm_identifier) robust cluster(firm_identifier)
Now, I also want to understand whether I can explain the time effect by 
a set of macroeconomic variables, M.
I was debating between the following three options.
1. Replace i.date by the macroeconomic variables, M.
areg Y X M, absorb(firm_identifier) robust cluster(firm_identifier)
But because my (limited) set of macro variables will not completely 
account for the time effect, it will bias
my standard errors on X. Now, I can use the standard errors from the 
original specification with i.date for X, so that is not a problem. But 
in the second specification above, will the standard errors on M itself 
be biased if there is additional unobserved time effect?
2. Use the T-1 dummy variables estimated from fixed effect panel 
regression and regress against macro variables as a second step regression.
3. I could average Y over N for each date, and then regress on macro 
variables.
What would be the pros and cons of the possible approaches?  Any 
comments will be appreciated!
Thanks!
NK
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/