Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: bug in bs4rw (or bug in Stata?)


From   Maarten buis <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: bug in bs4rw (or bug in Stata?)
Date   Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:44:50 +0000 (GMT)

--- On Wed, 23/3/11, Keith Dear wrote:
>  Stata is really saying "you are wrong to think that this
> command has any options". Subtly different.
> "comma not allowed" would have saved me some time.

But now think what would happen if you did specify options,
then you'd say: "OK, I'll leave the comma out (but not remove
the options)" and than Stata will still complain... Finding
error messages that will work for all errors you can think
of is hard.

-- Maarten

--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany

http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------


      

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index