Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: stcox continuous interaction issue stata 10


From   Maarten buis <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: stcox continuous interaction issue stata 10
Date   Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:19:30 +0000 (GMT)

--- On Mon, 21/3/11, Matt Cooper wrote:
> > > Just to confirm, prior to Stata11 there was no
> > > way to have an interaction variable created on the
> > > fly in a regression equation

--On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Maarten buis wrote:
> > That is correct for the continuous by continuous
> > case, but -xi- could do this for the discrete by
> > continous or discrete by discrete cases.

--- On Mon, 21/3/11, Nick Cox wrote:
> In addition, you could do it as a special case of -anova-.

Another special case that I forgot is the user written 
-xi3-, which you can find by typing in Stata -findit xi3-.

-- Maarten

--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany

http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------


      

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index