Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Richard Williams <richardwilliams.ndu@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: restricting margins to significant variables only |
Date | Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:23:04 -0500 |
At 10:34 AM 3/18/2011, Maarten buis wrote:
--- On Fri, 18/3/11, Richard Williams wrote: > Having said that, you can always have margins fix some > variable values at 0. That might make good substantive sense > in some cases (e.g. you want to make predictions for a group > coded 0) but I don't see why you would want to do so in this > case. Indeed, it would be silly to fix a variable at 0 when > 0 is not a possible or likely value for the variable. The original question was "Is it advisable to get margins to base its calculations on only those variables which are significant?" In that case you do not want to set the variable to zero but its effect, i.e. a form of stepwise selection, which I told him was a bad idea.
If i understand the original query, what was being proposed is even worse than stepwise. It sounded like he wanted to leave the insignificant variables in the model but treat their effects as though they were zero. Either way, it sounds like a choice between bad and worse.
------------------------------------------- Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463 HOME: (574)289-5227 EMAIL: Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.Edu WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/