Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: restricting margins to significant variables only


From   Richard Williams <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: restricting margins to significant variables only
Date   Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:23:04 -0500

At 10:34 AM 3/18/2011, Maarten buis wrote:
--- On Fri, 18/3/11, Richard Williams wrote:
> Having said that, you can always have margins fix some
> variable values at 0. That might make good substantive sense
> in some cases (e.g. you want to make predictions for a group
> coded 0) but I don't see why you would want to do so in this
> case. Indeed, it would be silly to fix a variable at 0 when
> 0 is not a possible or likely value for the variable.

The original question was "Is it advisable to get margins to
base its calculations on only those variables which are
significant?" In that case you do not want to set the variable
to zero but its effect, i.e. a form of stepwise selection,
which I told him was a bad idea.

If i understand the original query, what was being proposed is even worse than stepwise. It sounded like he wanted to leave the insignificant variables in the model but treat their effects as though they were zero. Either way, it sounds like a choice between bad and worse.


-------------------------------------------
Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
HOME:   (574)289-5227
EMAIL:  [email protected]
WWW:    http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index