Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
| From | Clive Nicholas <clivelists@googlemail.com> |
| To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
| Subject | Re: st: Multiple Imputation for panel data |
| Date | Wed, 23 Feb 2011 22:33:35 +0000 |
Brendan Halpin replied: > Not true. You're using information that would otherwise be discarded > (non-missing variables on cases with some missing data) at the expense > of making assumptions about the distribution of the missing data. And if those assumptions are wrong? -- Clive Nicholas [Please DO NOT mail me personally here, but at <clivenicholas@hotmail.com>. Please respond to contributions I make in a list thread here. Thanks!] "My colleagues in the social sciences talk a great deal about methodology. I prefer to call it style." -- Freeman J. Dyson. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/