Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: marginal effects following xtmelogit and xtlogit


From   "Jason P. Kelly" <jpk2@princeton.edu>
To   "statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: marginal effects following xtmelogit and xtlogit
Date   Thu, 10 Feb 2011 15:13:47 +0000

Hi all,

I am generate marginal effects after mixed-effects and fixed effects logistical regression models and have a quick question about how comparable the results are when using "margins,  predict (mu fixedonly) dydx(*)" after xtmelogit, opposed to "margins,  predict (pu0) dydx(*)" following xtlogit.  I.e. can the marginal effects be interpreted in the same way, after taking into account the assumptions and restrictions of the two models, or are mu and pu0 estimating two different things?  Any insight is much appreciated.

Many thanks,
Jason



*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index