Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: micombine versus mim

From   Anders Alexandersson <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: micombine versus mim
Date   Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:28:50 -0500

Elisabetta, use the more comprehensive -mim-, not -micombine-, as
stated in SJ 9:3 on page 466.
Both are user-written commands. The article is available here:

For more assistance, please provide an example that is easy to replicate.

Anders Alexandersson
[email protected]

On Sat, Jan 22, Elisabetta Petracci <[email protected]> wrote:

> anybody can tell why when I obtain different estimates when using
> command "micombine" compared to "mim" using STATA 11?
> I downloaded "mim" last version by Royston.
> I have imputed missing values doing 15 replications and to performe,
> in the end, a quantile regression.
*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index