Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: within estimator as "phyrric-victory" in corporate finance?

From   Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To   "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Subject   st: RE: within estimator as "phyrric-victory" in corporate finance?
Date   Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:00:09 +0000

I can't do the econometrics here but I can do the ancient history: Pyrrhic! 

[email protected] 

Erasmo Giambona

There is a large tendency in empirical corporate finance research to
rely on the within estimator. Now, this seems appropraite to many on
statistical ground. Empirical corporate finance research relies on
panel data for firms and using the within estimator allows to control
for for time-invariate firm heterogeniety. However, once we "subtract"
firm-level averages with the within estimators, it seems that the
coefficient estimates (within estimates) are ONLY measuring the effect
of a change in the RHS variables within firm on changes in the
dependent variable. This is problematic because firms change very
little and very slowly and with fixed-effects many independent
variables could "appeear" statistically and/or economically
insignificant, while they might still be very powerful in explaining
cross-sectional variation.

Perhaps I am missing something on the interpretation of the "within
estimator"? That is, are these estimators preserving cross-sectional
variation in any way?

I would appreaciate any reaction on this issue.

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index