Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Centering variables for interactions and using mi regress
From
Amy S <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Centering variables for interactions and using mi regress
Date
Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:06:06 -0800 (PST)
Richard, Thanks for the advice and passing along Paul's previous advice on the subject! That is interesting - a little counterintuitive, but certainly easier to implement.
I guess I will see if there are any other suggestions from the listserv in the meantime...
-Amy
--- On Sat, 1/15/11, Richard Williams <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Richard Williams <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: st: Centering variables for interactions and using mi regress
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 6:36 PM
> Interesting question, and I am not
> sure if there is any official wisdom on this. One
> reason to center is so that 0 is a meaningful value.
> For a variable like education, though, it might make sense
> to deduct 12 from each case, so that a score of 0 on the new
> variable corresponded to high school graduate. But in any
> event, if my life depended on it I think I would feel better
> doing the centering before imputation, rather than, say,
> have the centering be done differently with each
> imputation.
>
> Also, I am not sure if this is a good idea, but I suppose
> you could run the analyses without centering, use the -mean-
> command to get the imputed mean for each variable, and then
> center using the imputed means.
>
> As for the interactions, Paul Allison posted a while back
> that you should go ahead and compute interactions with the
> unimputed data and then let imputation fill in the missing
> values. This may seem counter-intuitive, in that, say,
> if X1 has an imputed value of 3, and X2 has an imputed value
> of 7, the imputed value for the interaction X1X2 need not be
> 21! But Allison argued that you get biased results if you
> compute the interaction after X1 and X2 have been imputed.
>
> I am just sort of guessing with all this though; listen to
> the experts if they come forward!
>
> At 04:12 PM 1/15/2011, Amy S wrote:
> > Hello everyone! This may be a very basic
> question for most of you, but I am running regressions
> using multiple imputation (mi regress) in stata 11.Â
> Because my models have interactions, I need to center the
> continuous variables used in those interactions.Â
> However, I am unsure how to do this for the variable I am
> imputing. In the past, without multiple imputation,
> I have just centered the variables first, and then used the
> new centered variables (and interaction terms with those
> center variables) in the regression. However,
> because the missing data on the variable is imputed based on
> the regression model itself, I donât think I can do
> that. Please correct me if Iâm wrong, but I
> doubt itâs legit to simply begin by centering the variable
> and then use mi regress to impute with the centered form of
> the variables, is it? Even if that is legit, how
> would I create the interaction term before putting it into
> the regression if all the data
> > has not been imputed yet and therefore there are
> missing variables? Maybe there is a simple way to do
> all of the centering and creating interaction terms and
> runnign the regression model with imputation all in one
> step - I'm hoping so!  Â
> > Â
> > Thanks in advance!
> > Â
> > -Amy
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *
> > * For searches and help try:
> > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
> -------------------------------------------
> Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
> OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
> HOME: (574)289-5227
> EMAIL: [email protected]
> WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/