Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Multiple imputation int() option in ICE


From   Maarten buis <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: Multiple imputation int() option in ICE
Date   Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:56:49 +0000 (GMT)

--- On Thu, 18/11/10, Alberto Osella wrote:
> I wish to impute a data set wit missing data in several
> variables of diferente type; one of them (BMI) is a
> continuos variables with a normal distribution. Obviuosly I
> should to bound BMI because there are some impossible values
> as 0 or 1000. 

Strictly speaking, the presence of these bounds means that the
distribution is not normally distributed. An alternative way of
ensuring the bounds is to specify the -match- option. I think I
remembered that there was quite a discussion on it in the Stata
Journal articles that accompanied ice, see: 
<www.stata-journal.com>

Hope this helps,
Maarten

--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany

http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------


      

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index