Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: OT: how to report statistics in (medical) journals
From 
 
"Seed, Paul" <[email protected]> 
To 
 
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
Subject 
 
RE: st: OT: how to report statistics in (medical) journals 
Date 
 
Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:50:35 +0000 
- --- On Tue, 16/11/10, Kaulisch, Marc wrote:
> I was asked to provide some tests for analyses in an
> article for a medical journal. <snip> Are there any
> guidelines for reporting statistics?
Nick Cox & Maarten Buis both suggest Marc looks at the 
journal's practice & policy.  This is fine as far as it gues, but current 
practice is not always best practice.  (Altman DG (2002) Poor Quality 
Medical Research. What Can Journals Do? JAMA 287 2765-2767 ) 
There are a number of guidelines for reporting clinical studies
(CONSORT - randomised comtrolled trials, STARD  - diagnostic 
tests, PRISMA - meta-analyses) and others.  
Marc should google these.
(Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, 
Getzsche PC & Lang T (2001). The revised CONSORT statement 
for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Annals of 
Internal Medicine 134:663-694.)
These stress producing estimates with confidence intervals as well as 
(and in preference to) p-values.  Rank-based tests such as 
Wilcoxon & Kruskal-Wallis are unhelpful in that 
they give no such estimates.  If Marc has the time, he may investigate 
the possibility of parametric tests, posibly after log-transformation, or 
dropping outliers, so that he can report meaningful estimates with 
confidence intervals.
BW
Paul Seed
 
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/