Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: gllamm and mim output for multi-level model
From
Robert A Yaffee <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: gllamm and mim output for multi-level model
Date
Sat, 16 Oct 2010 11:23:20 -0400
Stas,
Is there any effort under way to render polychor consistent with complex sample
analysis?
- Bob
Robert A. Yaffee, Ph.D.
Research Professor
Silver School of Social Work
New York University
Biosketch: http://homepages.nyu.edu/~ray1/Biosketch2009.pdf
CV: http://homepages.nyu.edu/~ray1/vita.pdf
----- Original Message -----
From: Stas Kolenikov <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, October 15, 2010 3:14 pm
Subject: Re: st: gllamm and mim output for multi-level model
To: [email protected]
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Christian Villenas
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I am working on a project that uses both gllamm and mim commands. When
> > running my models, I notice that the level 1 and 2
> > variance/covariances, as well as random effects are missing from the
> > output. Instead I get coefficients for the level 2 identifier and
> > random effects. What do those coefficients mean, and can I use them
> to
> > obtain the variance/covariance as per the gllamm output without the
> > mim command?
>
> You'd need to learn the internal parametrization used by -gllamm-.
> Level 2 is parametrized via Cholesky decomposition, so the variances
> and covariances are not directly available.
>
> --
> Stas Kolenikov, also found at http://stas.kolenikov.name
> Small print: I use this email account for mailing lists only.
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/