Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Steve Samuels <sjsamuels@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: "bsample" and "set seed" together do not work! |
Date | Fri, 17 Sep 2010 09:15:01 -0400 |
Your program works for me, if I eliminate the "start" line. The FAQ ask that you show us what you typed exactly and what Stata said. . If you don't show us the results, we can't tell what your mistake is. Steve On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Daniele Pacifico <danielepacifico@yahoo.it> wrote: > Dear Stata users, > > I am working with the command "bsample" and I discovered that the command "set > seed #" stops "bsample" from drawing different samples from my data.. Here is an > example: > > ___start example___ > clear all > set obs 1000 > drawnorm x > local r=6 > > forvalues i=1/`r'{ > preserve > bsample > su x > set seed 1234567890 > restore > } > > > ___end example___ > > I had this problem because I am writing an ado file that sets a seed when it > runs.. However, I discovered that the seed I define within my ado file > > creates the problem I have shown you above (i.e. I cannot use bsample with the > command defined in my ado file).. Do you have any advise about it? How can I > "unset" the seed so as to allow it to vary randomly again with bsample? > > Thanks in advance for any help. > > Best, > Daniele > > > > > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/