Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: marginal effects after heckman (Stata11)

From   "Stephani Jens" <>
To   <>
Subject   RE: st: marginal effects after heckman (Stata11)
Date   Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:50:18 +0200

Well even with -version control-, mfx is very much slower in Stata11 than it was in Stata10;
takes about 3 hours instead of 20 minutes (when I am trying to replicate some old analysis I made in Stata10).

-----Original Message-----
From: [] On Behalf Of Maarten buis
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: st: marginal effects after heckman (Stata11)

--- On Thu, 16/9/10, Stephani Jens wrote:
> after estimating a heckman selection model in Stata11 I
> need to compute the conditional and 
> unconditional marginal effects. In Stata10 this is done by
> using the mfx-command.
> As the mfx is not working properly in Stata11, does anyone
> know how this is done in Stata11 by 
> using the new margins-command? 

What makes you think that -mfx- is no longer working? -mfx- 
is superseded by -margins, but it should still work as

-- Maarten

Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen


*   For searches and help try:

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index