Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Steve Samuels <sjsamuels@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Write a parametric survival model in the hazard notation |

Date |
Sun, 5 Sep 2010 10:28:35 -0400 |

-- Florian Christ: While it is true that any survival model can be written in hazard notation, it is _not_ true that the coefficients will necessarily have an interpretation in terms of altering hazard ratios. The generalized gamma model is what is known as an accelerated failure time model, and the effect of the regression variables is to multiply time, not the hazard. No transformation of coefficients will remedy this, and a rewrite of the likelihood equation will not help. You _can_ plot hazard functions from the generalized gamma with -stcurve-. Use a bootstrap to get get CIs for the difference or ratio over a range of time points. As an aside: the BIC comparisons don't actually show that the model fit the data well, and residual checks and plots will still be necessary. Bit this is a long way around. To get easier interpretations in terms of hazard ratios, I suggest that you fit -stcox- and add interactions of covariates and time. Also consider -stpm2- (from SSC) for flexible parametric hazard models. Steve Steven J. Samuels sjsamuels@gmail.com 18 Cantine's Island Saugerties NY 12477 USA Voice: 845-246-0774 Fax: 206-202-4783 On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Christ, Florian <Florian.Christ@whu.edu> wrote: > Dear statalisters, > > I am new to statalist and would greatly appreciate your help with regard to my 'rookie' event-history problem. > > I am reporting coefficients from a parametric survival model (Generalized gamma distribution; following the AIC and BIC criterion) for my research project. However, as I am examining employee turnover as dependent variable interpretation of coefficients would be easier, if they would equal the hazard notation rather than the survival notation (e.g., positive coefficients should mean that the predictor increases the hazard). E.g., Cleves et al. mention in their great book on p.20 that "any parametric survival model can be written in the hazard notation". > > So I was wondering if and how I can practically write my survival model (generalized gamma distribution) in the hazard notation? Do I have to write an own maximum likelihood estimator for this? If so, how? Alternatively I may probably just transform the coefficients so that they reflect the hazard logic (probably with estout; transform). If there are other solutions to this problem I would also greatly appreciate your help. > > Thanks so much in advance for your help and support. > > Best regards, > > Florian > > > > Florian Christ > > WHU – Otto Beisheim School of Management > Doctoral Research Fellow > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: Write a parametric survival model in the hazard notation***From:*"Christ, Florian" <Florian.Christ@whu.edu>

**References**:**st: Write a parametric survival model in the hazard notation***From:*"Christ, Florian" <Florian.Christ@whu.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**st: uTrouble with the penalty of a Maximm penalized likelihood estimation (MPLE)** - Next by Date:
**st: RE: RE: changing date format** - Previous by thread:
**st: Write a parametric survival model in the hazard notation** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Write a parametric survival model in the hazard notation** - Index(es):