Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Airey, David C" <david.airey@Vanderbilt.Edu> |

To |
"statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: re: speed of R graphics vs Stata graphics |

Date |
Wed, 1 Sep 2010 18:53:32 -0500 |

. > I was cutting my teeth on some graphics related analysis of gene microarrays using R Bioconductor packages. In some of the plots there may be 10K to 40K data points. I noticed a significant speed advantage to the R graphics in such plots with many symbols, and with trellis (panel) graphics. To confirm my impression I plotted 100K points generated using corr2data with a correlation of 0.5 in Stata and R using scatter y x and with(mydata(plot(x,y)). Stata draws each symbol as you watch and took 9 seconds. R draws the plot off screen and then it appears after less than 3 seconds. I'm using StataMP 11.1 and R 2.11.1. > > (1) Anybody notice this speed advantage to R with graphics? > > (2) Anybody notice Stata and R about both have 11.1 in their version numbers? > > Now this is fascinating: . scatter y x, ms(oh) aspect(1) r; t=8.57 18:45:15 . scatter y x, ms(oh) aspect(1) mlw(vthin) r; t=8.45 18:46:14 . scatter y x, ms(oh) aspect(1) mlw(vvthin) r; t=7.73 18:48:59 . scatter y x, ms(point) aspect(1) r; t=6.21 18:49:44 It takes less time in Stata to graph smaller symbols or symbols with less paint! * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**RE: st: Problem with ZINB inflation equation estimates** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: use -predictnl- to construct confidence intervals** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: RE: Heckman two-step estimator** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: use -predictnl- to construct confidence intervals** - Index(es):