Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: RE: Heckman two-step estimator


From   "Martin Weiss" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   RE: st: RE: Heckman two-step estimator
Date   Wed, 1 Sep 2010 23:31:38 +0200

<>

Just to be sure, Siri, are you picking up this thread dating back all the
way to Feb: http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2010-02/msg00629.html?
Maybe you want to consider a change in your policy to delete all the stuff
you are replying to. Makes it hard to view your post in context...


HTH
Martin

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Siri
Sent: Mittwoch, 1. September 2010 23:13
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: RE: Heckman two-step estimator

Dear Rober, and other statalisters

I am also having problems with cmp. The message I receive when it is suppose
to fit the full model is: 

 <istmt>:  3499  cmp_lnL() not found

 So if anyone makes any progress on this problem, I would truly appreciate
if it is shared on this thread.

Siri
-- 
View this message in context:
http://statalist.1588530.n2.nabble.com/st-Heckman-two-step-estimator-tp45694
36p5488841.html
Sent from the Statalist mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index