Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | David Bai <db555@mail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: interpretation of squared term |
Date | Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:39:48 -0400 |
Thank you, Maarten.I include the squared term because this year variable might be non-linearly related to the outcome. Is there an easier way to roughly interpret the year effect? I do not want to go deeper to have an exact interpretation of the two year variables. E.g., what does a negative coefficient for a squared term mean? Thank you.
-----Original Message----- From: Maarten buis <maartenbuis@yahoo.co.uk> To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Sent: Thu, Aug 26, 2010 3:28 pm Subject: Re: st: interpretation of squared term --- On Thu, 26/8/10, David Bai <db555@mail.com> wrote:
I have a question regarding how to interpret squared term:
You can only interpret the time trend graphically. If you want to have a non-linear trend where you can interpret the coeficients, you can look at a linear spline, see -help mkspline-. Hope this helps, Maarten -------------------------- Maarten L. Buis Institut fuer Soziologie Universitaet Tuebingen Wilhelmstrasse 36 72074 Tuebingen Germany http://www.maartenbuis.nl -------------------------- * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/