Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: RE: nlsur and estout
From
"Martin Weiss" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
st: RE: nlsur and estout
Date
Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:17:35 +0200
<>
So -estout- is part of an ssc contribution by Ben Jann, and obtained via
-ssc inst estout-:
*************
sysuse auto, clear
nlsur (price = {a1} + {b1}*length) (weight = {a2} + {b2}*displacement),
ifgnls
esttab, noeqlines
*************
HTH
Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thoms
Sent: Mittwoch, 25. August 2010 12:59
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: nlsur and estout
Dear all,
I am trying to output regression results using estout after nlsur.
It seems that because of the way that e(b) is labelled:
e(b)[1,21]
b0: b1: b2: b3: b4:
b5: b6:
_cons _cons _cons _cons _cons
_cons _cons
y1 .84215046 .14613943 .00456665 -.00017402 .00006599
-1.640e-06 -.00006325
the resulting table has horizontal lines after each coefficient (due to
the _cons in the labels).
How can I work around this?
Thanks,
Thomas
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/