Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Nominal or ordinal?
From
Clive Nicholas <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Nominal or ordinal?
Date
Fri, 13 Aug 2010 03:50:29 +0100
Richard Williams replied:
> I didn't realize that -mlogtest- was originally an STB program. I don't
> know if it has changed much over the years, but the most current version is
> contained in -spost9-, available on Scott Long's web site. ( -findit spost9-
> ). The spost9 suite has a lot of other useful programs, including -brant-,
> which tests whether the assumptions of the ordered logit model are violated.
I was going to mention -spost9-, but nothing comes up either for -h
spost9- or -h mlogtest-, so I chose to cite the earlier reference for
the sake of some clarity over none. Good catch regarding -brant-: I'd
forgotten about that, but that test does come with health warnings.
But then, they all do.
--
Clive Nicholas
[Please DO NOT mail me personally here, but at
<[email protected]>. Please respond to contributions I make in
a list thread here. Thanks!]
"My colleagues in the social sciences talk a great deal about
methodology. I prefer to call it style." -- Freeman J. Dyson.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/