Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: duration analysis in gllamm


From   Maarten buis <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: duration analysis in gllamm
Date   Tue, 13 Jul 2010 06:02:30 +0000 (GMT)

--- On Mon, 12/7/10, Melaku Fekadu wrote:
> so you are advicing me to rely on only the parametrical
> one?

No, I am advising you to check whether your unobserved 
variable shows the behaviour I described when you use the 
non-parametric one. Probably the easiest way is to simulate
the unobserved variable and observe the distribution of the
survivors over time. Moreover, that pattern seems less 
likely to occur when you use more mass points, so adding
a mass point would be a straightforward sollution when
you encounter this problem.

Hope this helps,
Maarten

--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany

http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------


      

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index